After analysis, we realised that Meizu not trusted and known by the US consumers. US consumers have a sort of stereotyping concept that China products are of low quality. They would rather support the Home team which mainly are the competitors of Meizu e.g. Apple. Apple and Google are constantly improving themselves to suit customers’ needs, gaining their trust. Furthermore, Meizu has lack of support outside China. We also came up with some solutions to the problems.
- Meizu should set up a headquarters in the US.
- Meizu should work with the telcos in the US to make their phones more popular through advertising and campaigning,. e.g. AT&T, Verizon.
- Meizu should hire people in the US and have better working benefits like Google.
- Meizu should be unique (e.g. own operating system).
As part of the audience, I thought that some of the presentations are very well prepared and the presenters were enthusiastic about the presentations too. I must also admit that the sometimes the presentations are quite boring too as they were either too wordy or too long. Group 1 presented on Youku Tudou. They had analysed all 4 companies including YouTube which is Youku Tudou's main competitor if it expanded to the US market. However, their group mentioned only brief details of their suggestions. Group 2 presented on WeChat. Their presentation was short and sweet and had really good in-depth analysis on the company. However, I would like to point out one of their suggestions was flawed. They mentioned that they should hire the employees from rivals in China, but isn't that poaching? Group 3 presented on Li Ning. I felt that their presentation had also a good analysis of the company. Their suggestions were quite brief. Their 'Great Plan' was very good plan and estimated the problems and challenges that Li Ning might face and also come up with predictions as to when it would break into the US market, etc. Group 4 presented on Geely. Their group was the last group to present therefore it was rather plain except for the fact that they handled the Q & A session very well and all my doubts were answered. Group 5 did on Qihoo. I liked the design of their slides. The unique part was when they had a demonstration of the company's product and showed us through. Their way of engaging the audience was better than the rest of the groups. Group 7 did on XTEP. Their presentation was quite unclear and I had to ask them some questions after their presentation. They did not mention how to improve the design and what they define by creative if there was a test for it. Group 8 did on Baidu. I was already very familiar with Baidu thus the group did fine. They did not address the publicity issue.
In conclusion, I feel that I have indeed benefited from the presentations a lot and learnt more about the different Chinese companies that I have heard from. I feel that Chinese companies would find it difficult to expand to the US market mainly because of this 'China Firewall'. The government does not really approve of the companies' expansion as they feel that China is already the best and also did not want influence from the West, therefore resulting in a very conservative Chinese market. However, the US market is much more free and easy. Overall, I feel that the presentations were also quite good however it would be better if the audience gave more respect to the speakers. In the future, I hope to have more of such activities but with a better environment.
Hi Sherwin,
ReplyDeleteIt is nice to see you have written another reflection for CDE. Firstly, it is very nice to see that you have organized your reflection very well, it is a lot easier to read your reflection and understand it. It’s very good that you have commented on every group and gave them comments to improve their presentation.
Firstly, I also feel that we did not bad for our presentation. We did analysis on Meizu and the other companies like Lenovo, Google and Apple, state their problems and what they did to success, and came up with solutions for Meizu to expand into the US market. We spend quite some time doing research and come up with the plans and solutions. However, as one of the last groups, many of the people were listening to us as we present. Mr Karplus even had to stop us and make the class quite.
Secondly, I also feel that many groups did quite well for their presentation. Although some groups had some small flaws and errors, but generally they managed to come up with good solutions. Some groups like group 3, doing LiNing had their powerpoints too wordy and it was hard to read.
Generally, it’s nice to see that you have enjoyed the presentations and we all have something to take away from the presentation.
Ming Chuan
Yo!
ReplyDeleteI am really impressed by how 'wordy' your journal is, keep it up Sherwin! I agree with you that we are one of the 'better' groups in the class. We have finished preparing our slides days before the actual presentation. Unlike some groups which are still doing right before their presentation. I think that we had done a good job and like what Mr Karplus had said, our solutions are that detailed and our targeted audience is too limited too. I can see that you had commented on all the groups, which is very good! I believe you have learnt a lot of new things after listening to other. I also agree that the audiences are not too attentive and some of them are playing with their gadgets. I hope that they can be more attentive and show respect to the presenters and their hard works. In conclusion, it's good to see you learning new knowledge after listening to the presentations and i hope you would have a good time ahead!
-yikun
Hi Sherwin,
ReplyDelete'It is good to see you putting so much effort into your Journal. you have concluded our presentation very well. I think that for our presentation, we still lack the target audience, but I think we have prepared well for it. For other group's I think they have done a good job as well. But for some companies there are flaws in it. for example the youku one. If the Americans already have a good video platform for their daily usage, why will they adopt a new, totally unfamiliar platform? I think you have pointed out their flaws well. I hope that you have learnt from the other groups, and I'm glad to see you enjoying the presentations.
Hi Sherwin,
ReplyDeleteYour reflection is a very good and well elaborated one. To make your points clearer, you even put point form for some of the points and I think this is very good. I agree with your research that there is a common stereotyping of Chinese products as inferior quality in the US. I also agree with you that with the lack of support outside of China, it is hard for Meizu to prosper out of China.
I agree with you that your group had quite a good presentation and it is very sad to see that not a lot of people were listening attentively to your presentation. Maybe if everyone listened carefully during all of the presentations, we can actually learn much more.
I also agree with you that the other groups were pretty well prepared too but I think that one of problems is that the solutions that many of the groups gave a quite unoriginal, sometimes just simply copying the Google or Apple way.
Looking at your reflection, I can see that you have learned a lot from the presentations and I hope that you will have a smooth learning journey for CDE.